Tuesday, June 27, 2017
  Search 
Home
Opportunities
Partners
Publications
About Us
 
 
Please enter your email here, we would like to keep you informed.
 
 
Connect With Us - Facebook RSS
<June 2017>
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930
Sections
Liberty In The News
Liberty Events
Conference Proceedings
Culture
Agriculture
Democracy
Development is the Key
Economic Freedom
Education for Life
Enterpreneurship
Environment
Freedom of Expression
Freedom to Trade
Globalization for the Good
Health is Wealth
Intellectual Property Rights
International Relations
Liberty is Security
Limited Government
Principles of Politics
Privatisation
Population - the ultimate resource
Property Rights
Regulatory Affairs
Rule of Law
Tax Freedom
Facts & Figures
Opportunities
Competitions
 Economic Freedom
 
Big Boost to Big Retail Needed
Liberty Institute, India Monday, May 30, 2011

Ravi Shanker Kapoor
Ravi Shanker Kapoor suggests the government should follow IMG recommendations of FDI in multi-brand retail and changes in agriculture marketing laws to control soaring. He says, "in India, it is not rational discourse and informed debate that seem to be clearing the path for FDI in big retail; it is not that politicians are moving towards a sensible consensus; it is almost a crisis situation that is thrusting policy change on our political masters."

It took unrelenting high inflation for the government to see merit in the case of organized retail. With most measures—regulating exports and imports, rate hikes by the Reserve Bank of India, etc—failing to rein in prices, an important section in the ruling dispensation is veering towards the view that big chains can help bring down inflation.

So, the inter-ministerial group (IMG) has recommended foreign direct investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail and changes in agriculture marketing laws to control soaring. “We are taking a clear position on FDI in multi-brand retail. Of course, it is a recommendation, not policy,” Chief Economic Advisor and IMG chairman Kaushik Basu said last week.

The IMG also suggested the chalking out of a model Agriculture Produce Marketing Committee (APMC) law. States could adopt it to get rid of supply bottlenecks at the local level. “There is a need to revise the AMPC Act to reduce the price gap between farm gate and consumer prices. We need a model act to be adopted by states,” Basu said.

Other members of the IMG are: Planning Commission Member Secretary Sudha Pillai, Agriculture Secretary P.K. Basu, Food Secretary B.C. Gupta, Finance Secretary Sushma Nath, Economic Affair Secretary R. Gopalan, Commerce Secretary Rahul Khullar and Chief Statistician T.C.A. Anant.

The IMG’s viewpoint is not without foundation. In a study three years ago, the Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations had favored big retail.

Apart from the inflation concerns, there is another reason the government should be more amiable to foreign investment: FDI inflows dipped by 22.5 per cent to $3.4 billion in 2010-11. Global consultancy firm KPMG executive director Krishan Malhotra was reported as saying, “The decline is mainly because of global financial problems. There was a worldwide downfall.”

However, the services sector is still on the top of the chart in attracting maximum investment; this is primarily because the sector contributes over half the gross domestic product or GDP.

As always in India, it is not rational discourse and informed debate that seem to be clearing the path for FDI in big retail; it is not that politicians are moving towards a sensible consensus; it is almost a crisis situation that is thrusting policy change on our political masters. Crisis leading to good policy framework—it happened, on a much larger scale in 1991; it may happen once again.

Politics, unfortunately, remains mired in triteness and rhetoric. The government was lukewarm to FDI in organized retail. The Bharatiya Janata Party has always opposed it. The Communist Party of India (Marxist) has been prompt to denounce Basu’s views. The CPM politburo said. “The specious arguments put forward by IMG that entry of MNC retail giants like Walmart will enhance efficiency of the supply chain and bring down the trading margins belie international experience.”

Typically, the Marxists see a conspiracy by evil forces to impose “pro-MNC neo-liberal framework.” The CPM said, “In fact, MNCs will enjoy much greater monopoly power over both farmers and consumers and manipulate prices to their benefit while, at the same time, livelihood of millions of small unorganized retailers will be virtually wiped out.”

The Manmohan Singh government has to take on such disinformation and demagoguery. It must go ahead with the IMG recommendations.

This article was published in the Liberty Institute on Monday, May 30, 2011.
Author : Mr Kapoor is a journalist and commentator on current affairs, based in Delhi.
Tags- Find more articles on - big retail | Foreign direct investment | Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations | inter-ministerial group recommendations | Kaushik Basu | multi-brand retail

Post your Comments on this Article

Name  
Email    
Comment  
Comments will be moderated

Economic Freedom
More Articles


 
An Initiative of
LIBERTY INSTITUTE, INDIA
All rights reserved.