picture - In Defence of Liberty
Sunday, April 19, 2015
About Us
Please enter your email here, we would like to keep you informed.
Connect With Us - Facebook RSS
<April 2015>
Liberty In The News
Liberty Events
Conference Proceedings
Development is the Key
Economic Freedom
Education for Life
Freedom of Expression
Freedom to Trade
Globalization for the Good
Health is Wealth
Intellectual Property Rights
International Relations
Liberty is Security
Limited Government
Principles of Politics
Population - the ultimate resource
Property Rights
Regulatory Affairs
Rule of Law
Tax Freedom
Facts & Figures
 Freedom of Expression
Strange fatwas
The Indian Express<, India Sunday, June 06, 2010

Soli J. Sorabjee
Some of the fatwas issued by Darul Uloom Deoband, India's respected Islamic seminary makes little sense in the present world. Fatwas were even issued against muslim women working in offices were men were working. Morals are subjective. We should tolerate dissenting opinions, writes Soli j sorabjee in The Indian Express.
unfaithful husband click wifes who cheat
how to cheat click why people cheat

The Darul Uloom Deoband is one of India’s well-respected Islamic seminaries. Its fatwas against suicide attacks and its condemnation of the killing of innocent persons were most welcome. Of late it has issued fatwas that Muslim women should not work in offices where men too are employed and also that working in banks is un-Islamic. The Deoband has also declared that opting for an insurance policy is against the tenets of Islam because insurance policy is unlawful as it is based on interest and gambling. In the present age of trade and commerce and globalisation, do these fatwas make sense?

... ...

Notions of social morality are subjective. Criminal law cannot be used to interfere with the domain of personal autonomy when the acts complained of are not offences. The thrust of the judgment is that “we must lay stress on the need to tolerate unpopular views in the socio-cultural space. Under our democratic constitutional scheme different views are allowed to be expressed by the proponents and opponents”. Expression of opinion, which is contrary to conventional notions of decency and morality, has to be tolerated and the same cannot be a ground to penalise the author. Viewed in proper perspective, the judgment highlights the need for tolerance, deprecates moral policing and attempts by intolerant bigots to penalise people holding contrary views by recourse to criminal law. And therein lies the real merit of the judgment.


how many women cheat I cheated on my wife click here
This article was published in the The Indian Express< on Sunday, June 06, 2010. Please read the original article here.
Authors :
Mr Sorabjee is a former attorney general for India
viagra without prescription scams viagra warnings open
signs of a cheater link online
my wife emotionally cheated on me open women who love to cheat

buy cheap viagra where do i buy viagra online viagra stori
my wife emotionally cheated on me open women who love to cheat
Tags- Find more articles on - fatwa | morals

Post your Comments on this Article

Comments will be moderated

Freedom of Expression
Denmark: Danish cartoon debate: A chronology
From Cyberia to Siberia: Price of protecting privacy
Of girls and boys
God in God’s Own Country
Changing mores on religion and gender in Bangladesh
The Possible Prosecution of WikiLeaks
Histrionics Over the Mosque: Symbolism Crowds Out Reality
Two cheers for American tolerance
Sri Lanka: Freedom of Expression on the Internet not so secure, CPA study