Tuesday, November 21, 2017
  Search 
Home
Opportunities
Partners
Publications
About Us
 
 
Please enter your email here, we would like to keep you informed.
 
 
Connect With Us - Facebook RSS
<November 2017>
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930
Sections
Liberty In The News
Liberty Events
Conference Proceedings
Culture
Agriculture
Democracy
Development is the Key
Economic Freedom
Education for Life
Enterpreneurship
Environment
Freedom of Expression
Freedom to Trade
Globalization for the Good
Health is Wealth
Intellectual Property Rights
International Relations
Liberty is Security
Limited Government
Principles of Politics
Privatisation
Population - the ultimate resource
Property Rights
Regulatory Affairs
Rule of Law
Tax Freedom
Facts & Figures
Opportunities
Competitions
 Intellectual Property Rights
 
Reader's pay a price for authors' greed
The Australian, Australia Wednesday, July 01, 2009

Tim Wilson
Although parallel import restrictions exist in Australia for the three main branches of intellectual property – copyright, patents and trademarks – they are inconsistent and unnecessary for copyrighted works. They need to be registered with a government agency country by country. But they rarely are because of the cost involved, and as a result there is no guarantee that royalty payments will be made to the right holder on an import, writes Tim Wilson for The Australian.

Yesterday the Productivity Commission handed to the federal government its final report on whether restrictions on importing copyrighted books, or parallel import restrictions, should be eased. These restrictions inflate the price of books by limiting competitive imports, and the beneficiaries are the local printing and publishing executives, at the expense of consumers.

 

The industry operates under the 30-day rule, which allows import restrictions for the life of the copyright – which means the life of the author, plus 70 years – so long as the book is made available in Australia within 30 days of being published overseas. Exemptions are provided for booksellers filling a single order and for consumers buying books directly from online retailers.

 

 

Author Peter Carey described the proposed measures as "cultural self-suicide", and others have argued they will cost jobs and reduce authors' income as well as the number of local authors published.

 

Their claims are baseless. When the Howard government removed import restrictions on compact discs in 1998, it was accused of gutting the music industry and jeopardising the income of musicians. But industry data shows royalties increased from $81.8million in 2003 to $108m in 2007, and the number of performers receiving royalties also increased. Meanwhile, the average price of a CD album has fallen by 32per cent.

 

 

But the most absurd claim is that easing import restrictions would water down the exclusive rights copyright confers. In a book there are two property rights: one relates to the physical book and the other to the copyright text. Import restrictions are designed to protect the former and don't affect the latter.

 

 

Copyright, on the other hand, is automatically conferred to the right holder and it is protected in all countries that are signatories to the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic works. Royalties are paid to copyright holders when their works are published in those countries, based on the laws of each country. The only justification for import restrictions for copyright is to guard against counterfeit products.

 

Australia's parallel import restrictions may be included in the Copyright Act, but they are not a part of IP protection. They are a trade barrier disguised as IP protection.

 

The costs of these restrictions are borne by the least affluent Australians, who are paying higher prices for books than necessary. And that is harming education opportunities for Australia's poorest.

 

Rather than seeking industry protection, Australia's book industry should be focusing on how to expand the market for books by making them cheaper. It's the only sustainable way of guaranteeing their income. And consumers win, too.  

This article was published in the The Australian on Wednesday, July 01, 2009. Please read the original article here.
Author : Tim Wilson is director of the intellectual property and free trade unit at the Institute of Public Affairs in Melbourne, Australia, and author of "Undermining Mitigation Technology".
Tags- Find more articles on - Intellectual property rights | patents

Post your Comments on this Article

Name  
Email    
Comment  
Comments will be moderated

More Related Articles
Intellectual Property Rights
More Articles


 
An Initiative of
LIBERTY INSTITUTE, INDIA
All rights reserved.