Thursday, March 30, 2017
  Search 
Home
Opportunities
Partners
Publications
About Us
 
 
Please enter your email here, we would like to keep you informed.
 
 
Connect With Us - Facebook RSS
<March 2017>
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031
Sections
Liberty In The News
Liberty Events
Conference Proceedings
Culture
Agriculture
Democracy
Development is the Key
Economic Freedom
Education for Life
Enterpreneurship
Environment
Freedom of Expression
Freedom to Trade
Globalization for the Good
Health is Wealth
Intellectual Property Rights
International Relations
Liberty is Security
Limited Government
Principles of Politics
Privatisation
Population - the ultimate resource
Property Rights
Regulatory Affairs
Rule of Law
Tax Freedom
Facts & Figures
Opportunities
Competitions
 Liberty is Security
 
Pakistan needs to learn the lessons from Lahore attack
Indian Express, India Friday, March 06, 2009

Murtaza Razvi
The assault on the Sri Lankan cricket team in Lahore exposed the most dangerous of vile mechanisms plaguing Pakistan. The Lankans were promised presidential security: armed policemen posted every few yards, mobile phones and remote-controlled devises are jammed, helicopters fly aerial reconnaissance missions overhead; elite police force trained to combat terrorists accompanies the convoy. Not a fraction of this kind of security was provided to ensure the visiting team’s safety in Lahore, writes Murtaza Razvi the Indian Express.

The Lahore assault on the Sri Lankan cricket team exposed the most dangerous of vile mechanisms plaguing Pakistan today. Never before was the government seen to be so not in control. For now it is free for all, amidst shameless admissions by officials concerned of security lapses that facilitated the terrorists.

 

Here’s some background to Tuesday’s attack. On February 25, Lahore (and the Punjab province) was placed under governor’s rule after President Zardari dismissed the provincial government, following Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif’s disqualification orders passed by a controversial Supreme Court. The first thing Governor Taseer did after assuming charge was to reshuffle the top bureaucrats whom he suspected of being loyal to the Sharifs. He also resurrected the colonial-time commissionerate system whereby the commissioner serves as a de-facto district chief with magisterial powers aimed at ensuring law and order. The Lahore commissioner, Khusro Pervaiz, actually admitted on Wednesday his administration’s failure to provide adequate security to the Sri Lankans.

 

Punjab officials have since revealed that they were tipped off by intelligence agencies that certain extremists were planning to attack the Sri Lankan cricket team. It can be argued that the city’s entire security apparatus was focused on the governor’s priority orders to contain the Sharifs and their supporters when the attack took place.

 

The Sri Lankans were promised presidential security, a euphemism for fool-proof cover provided to the former president, Musharraf, and which Zardari and the PM continue to enjoy. Here’s how it works: roads are cleared of all traffic well in advance of the VVIP movement. Armed policemen may be posted every few yards along the route, and on top of buildings overlooking the road. Mobile phones and remote-controlled devises are jammed; helicopters fly aerial reconnaissance missions overhead; elite police force trained to combat terrorists accompanies the convoy, and Punjab has the best-trained force; reinforcement units are on red alert. The security cover of this order is the bane of citizens as it leaves massive traffic jams in its wake, but the government has successfully argued for it.

 

There was not a fraction of this kind of security provided to ensure the visiting team’s safety in Lahore when they were promised all of it. Six policemen were killed by the terrorists before they proceeded to attack the tourists’ bus, but there was no sight of reinforcement units on call. Even the Lahore mayor enjoys a much better security when he’s out and about town. The lapse is reminiscent of the so-called security provided by Musharraf to Benazir Bhutto.

 

The fact that Islamist terrorism has arrived in our cities in a big way cannot be denied anymore. The perpetrators of violence are well-trained and armed with latest weapons. The attacks are planned for precision targeting; they have an exit strategy after creating mayhem, and they strike at the time and place of their own choosing. The September Marriott Hotel bombing in Islamabad and the Mumbai siege in November last year are the latest cases in point. The assaults followed the attacks on Benazir’s rallies in October and December the year before.

 

And what has the government done to contain the terrorists? Practically nothing, besides clamping another ban on the same extremist organisations which had been banned a long time ago by Musharraf. It is not only the lack of will to act decisively against the rogue elements, it is also the contrasting and shocking will to placate them by extending them an olive branch, as has been done in Swat. Despite the overwhelming public mandate given to this, one of the most secular-based governments in recent years, it is choosing political expediency over public and national interest.

 

The result is before us all:

Pakistan and its neighbours are threatened like never before with what

This article was published in the Indian Express on Friday, March 06, 2009. Please read the original article here.
Author : The writer is an editor with Dawn, Karachi
Tags- Find more articles on - Islamic fundamentalists | taliban | terrorism

Post your Comments on this Article

Name  
Email    
Comment  
Comments will be moderated

More Related Articles
Liberty is Security
More Articles


 
An Initiative of
LIBERTY INSTITUTE, INDIA
All rights reserved.